Microphones
Microphone Polar Pattern Chart
Quick answer
A hypercardioid microphone rejects most at 110 degrees off axis and gives about 6 dB more gain before feedback than an omnidirectional. Cardioid nulls at 180 degrees and gains 4.8 dB, supercardioid nulls at 126 degrees and gains 5.7 dB. Wedge placement follows the null.
A polar pattern is the only microphone specification that directly buys you volume. Every other choice on a platform is about tone; this one is about how loud the system can run before it rings. The mechanism is simple: a microphone that ignores sound from some directions can be turned up further before it hears enough of a loudspeaker to start feeding back.
The number that quantifies it is random energy efficiency, which is the fraction of diffuse room sound the pattern accepts compared with an omnidirectional. A cardioid accepts one third, which is 4.8 dB of extra gain. A hypercardioid accepts one quarter, which is 6 dB. Those decibels are free, and they are thrown away every week by pointing the null at nothing in particular. Pattern choice by source is in the microphone type by source chart.
On this page
What does each polar pattern reject, and where?
The null angle column is the one to act on. It is measured from the front of the microphone, so 180 degrees means directly behind and 126 degrees means two directions, each 54 degrees either side of directly behind.
A hypercardioid has a random energy efficiency of 0.25, giving 6.0 dB more gain before feedback than an omnidirectional, with its deepest rejection at 110 degrees off axis rather than directly behind.
| Pattern | Rejection at 180 degrees | Null angles | Random energy efficiency | Distance factor | Gain before feedback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omnidirectional | 0 dB | None | 1.00 | 1.0 | 0 dB, the reference |
| Subcardioid, wide cardioid | About 10 dB | None, no true null | 0.55 | 1.3 | +2.6 dB |
| Cardioid | 20 dB or more | 180 degrees | 0.33 | 1.7 | +4.8 dB |
| Supercardioid | About 12 dB | 126 degrees, two directions | 0.27 | 1.9 | +5.7 dB |
| Hypercardioid | About 6 dB | 110 degrees, two directions | 0.25 | 2.0 | +6.0 dB |
| Bidirectional, figure of eight | 0 dB, inverted polarity | 90 degrees, two directions | 0.33 | 1.7 | +4.8 dB |
| Half-cardioid, boundary | 20 dB or more | 180 degrees along the surface | 0.33 | 1.7 | +4.8 dB, plus boundary gain |
| Shotgun, lobar | About 15 dB | 120 degrees, plus side lobes | 0.20 | 2.2 | +7.0 dB |
Random energy efficiency is the fraction of diffuse room sound the pattern accepts relative to an omnidirectional. Distance factor is the square root of its reciprocal, and tells you how much further from the source the microphone can sit for the same ratio of direct to reverberant sound. Gain before feedback is the theoretical advantage in a diffuse field, which real rooms approach but rarely reach.
Where should the monitor wedge go for each pattern?
This is the practical payoff. Point the null at the loudest loudspeaker the microphone can see, and the free decibels arrive. Point it anywhere else and you have bought a directional microphone and used it as an omni.
A cardioid vocal microphone wants one wedge directly behind it at 180 degrees, while a supercardioid wants two wedges at 126 degrees, which is 54 degrees either side of directly behind.
| Pattern | Wedge position | Number of wedges | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardioid | Directly behind the microphone, on the floor at 180 degrees | One, centred | Two wedges either side, which puts both in the live area. |
| Supercardioid | Two wedges at 126 degrees, so 54 degrees either side of straight back | Two, splayed | One wedge straight back, which sits in the rear lobe. |
| Hypercardioid | Two wedges at 110 degrees, so 70 degrees either side of straight back | Two, splayed wider | Treating it like a cardioid. The rear lobe is only 6 dB down. |
| Omnidirectional | No safe position exists | Use in-ears instead | Expecting a lavalier to survive a wedge at any angle. |
| Bidirectional | Directly to the sides, at 90 degrees | Two, at the sides | Forgetting the rear is fully live and inverted in polarity. |
| Half-cardioid boundary | Behind the surface the microphone is mounted on | One, well back | Placing a floor wedge in front, where the hemisphere is fully live. |
| Headset, directional | Behind the wearer, and the wearer must not turn around | One, centred | A roaming pastor who walks past the wedge while talking. |
All angles are measured from the front axis of the microphone, not from the singer. If a vocalist turns to face the drummer, their microphone turns with them and the null moves off the wedge, which is why gain before feedback on a handheld is always worse than the specification suggests. In-ear monitoring removes the problem entirely and is the reason it is worth the money on a busy platform.
Which pattern does each catalog microphone use?
The microphones a church is most likely to own, sorted by pattern, so the wedge placement table above can be applied directly.
Most church vocal microphones are cardioid, including the Shure SM58 and SM57, while the Beta 58A is supercardioid and the Audix OM5 is hypercardioid, which is 1.2 dB more gain before feedback than the SM58.
Patterns are as published by the manufacturer for each model. Where a church is choosing between two otherwise similar handhelds, the pattern difference is worth roughly 1 dB of gain before feedback between cardioid and hypercardioid, which is real but smaller than the difference good placement makes.
What the specification does not tell you about patterns
A polar pattern is frequency dependent. The neat heart shape printed on a data sheet is the pattern at one frequency, usually around 1 kHz. Almost every directional microphone becomes progressively closer to omnidirectional as frequency falls, because the capsule is small compared with the wavelength. Below about 200 Hz a cardioid rejects very little, which is why low frequency feedback and stage rumble are so much harder to control than the midrange ring the pattern handles well.
Proximity effect comes with directionality. Every pattern except omnidirectional boosts low frequencies as the source gets closer, and the effect is stronger on tighter patterns. A hypercardioid an inch from a singer’s mouth can add 10 dB or more below 200 Hz. That is why a vocalist who eats the microphone sounds boomy and a vocalist who backs off sounds thin, and why a high pass filter on every vocal channel is standard practice rather than a repair.
Off-axis sound is coloured, not just quieter. The rejection figure describes level, not tone. Sound arriving from 90 degrees on a typical cardioid is not simply 6 dB down, it is 6 dB down and noticeably duller, because the high frequencies fall off faster than the midrange. This is what makes a choir sound distant and muffled when the microphones are aimed badly, and it is why an inexpensive microphone with a smooth off-axis response often outperforms an expensive one with a ragged one on a busy platform.
Handling noise and wind sensitivity rise with directionality. A directional capsule works by letting sound reach both sides of the diaphragm through rear ports, and those ports also admit breath blasts and handling vibration. An omnidirectional capsule is sealed and is dramatically better in both respects, which is the genuine reason omnidirectional lavaliers remain common despite their feedback disadvantage.
Where this chart does not apply
It assumes a diffuse, reverberant field. The gain before feedback figures are theoretical advantages in a room where reflected energy arrives from all directions equally. Real sanctuaries are not diffuse, and a microphone that happens to be pointed at a hard rear wall can perform worse than the table suggests while one in a treated room performs better.
Placement beats pattern, every time. Halving the distance from a source to a microphone gains 6 dB, which equals or exceeds the entire advantage of moving from omnidirectional to hypercardioid. A cardioid two inches from a mouth outperforms a hypercardioid a foot away in every respect. Pattern is the last refinement, not the first fix. See how to eliminate feedback in a church.
It does not describe boundary microphones fully. A half-cardioid on a hard surface gains about 6 dB from the surface itself, because direct and reflected sound arrive in phase, and it avoids the comb filtering a conventional microphone suffers near a boundary. That gain is in addition to the pattern advantage and is why a boundary microphone can outperform its polar plot.
Tighter is not automatically better. A hypercardioid has a live rear lobe only 6 dB down, so pointing one straight at a rear wall behind the platform can be worse than a cardioid. Very tight patterns also demand consistent technique, which volunteer vocalists and guest speakers do not reliably have.
It says nothing about in-ear monitoring. Once the wedges are gone, the pattern argument largely evaporates and the choice returns to tone and handling. That is the strongest practical case for in-ear monitors over floor wedges on a crowded platform.
Sources
- Random energy efficiency and distance factor values for standard polar patterns, from established microphone engineering practice
- Published polar pattern specifications from manufacturer data sheets for the microphones listed
- Gain before feedback relationship, ten times the base ten logarithm of the reciprocal of random energy efficiency
Frequently asked questions
Which microphone polar pattern is best for church?
Cardioid for most handheld vocals, because it rejects 20 dB or more from directly behind and tolerates imperfect technique. Supercardioid or hypercardioid where a platform is loud and needs more gain before feedback, at the cost of a live rear lobe and less forgiving placement. Omnidirectional only where feedback is not a concern, such as a seated interview.
Where do I put the monitor wedge for a supercardioid mic?
Two wedges at 126 degrees from the front of the microphone, which is 54 degrees either side of directly behind. A single wedge placed straight back sits in the rear lobe, where a supercardioid is only about 12 dB down, and that is the single most common reason a Beta 58A delivers less gain than expected on a church platform.
How much extra volume does a directional microphone give?
About 4.8 dB for a cardioid over an omnidirectional, 5.7 dB for a supercardioid and 6.0 dB for a hypercardioid, measured as gain before feedback in a diffuse field. Those are real decibels but they arrive only if the null is actually aimed at the loudspeaker. A badly aimed hypercardioid performs like an omni with worse handling noise.
Why does my microphone sound boomy when someone holds it close?
Proximity effect, which every directional pattern has and tighter patterns have more of. Close to the source, low frequencies are boosted, often by 10 dB or more below 200 Hz an inch from the mouth. It is not a fault. A high pass filter on every vocal channel is standard practice, and it is why vocalists who vary their distance sound inconsistent.
Is a hypercardioid always better than a cardioid?
No. A hypercardioid has a live rear lobe only about 6 dB down, so aiming one at a hard rear wall or a main loudspeaker behind the platform can perform worse than a cardioid. It also demands consistent technique that volunteer vocalists and guest speakers often do not have. The extra 1.2 dB is smaller than the difference good placement makes.
Does a polar pattern work the same at all frequencies?
No, and this is the most useful caveat on the page. The pattern printed on a data sheet is measured at around 1 kHz, and almost every directional microphone becomes closer to omnidirectional as frequency falls. Below about 200 Hz a cardioid rejects very little, which is exactly why low frequency feedback and stage rumble are harder to control than midrange ring.
Researched, not professional advice. This page is compiled from published manufacturer specifications, operator manuals, FCC rules, published standards and owner-review consensus, not hands-on testing. Sound system design, rigging loudspeakers overhead, and any electrical work are jobs for a qualified professional: have flown loudspeakers and their attachment points signed off by a structural engineer or a certified rigger, and have all wiring done by a licensed electrician to your local code. Wireless microphone rules change, so confirm the current FCC position before buying. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.